E-Folder
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Business > Strategic Planning > Learning From the Jury - Are You Letting Assumptions Damage Your Business?

Tags

  • devices
  • others
  • which
  • companies involved
  • combination products
  • companies involved

  • Links

  • Which Laptop Stands Up to the Demands of a Businesswoman
  • Banneralities - An Affiliate's-Eye View - Size Does Matter!
  • 4 Dazzling Midrange Cell Phones
  • E-Folder - Learning From the Jury - Are You Letting Assumptions Damage Your Business?

    I recently completed 2 weeks of jury service and it’s an interesting and fascinating experience. Obviously I can’t tell
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    you about specific cases but I do have some thoughts on the process of being part of a jury.

    In my first week, I was th
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    foreman of our jury and that meant facilitating the discussion and making sure everyone could express their point of vi
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    w and that we all agreed on our verdict.

    During the course of our deliberations a number of things became apparent.

    Ma
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    y people have prejudices that they don’t realise they have.

    Many people assume their view of the world is the “right” v
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    ew

    Many people don’t really understand the influence they have on other people – directly or indirectly.

    It was quite
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    cary how some individuals were convinced of the defendants guilt purely based on a perception of who they thought they w
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    re. Whole scenarios, stories and pictures were being created about what probably happened, what they probably did, said
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    nd behaved like and what “that type” of person is like.

    When I pointed out that we must only base our decisions on the
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    acts as presented to us and the law as directed by the judge, some people saw they were “making up” evidence based on th
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    ir assumptions and perceptions but others got quite irritated and couldn’t see that what they were basing their views on
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    was pure speculation, assumption and prejudice.

    This got me thinking that we all make assumptions at times, which are o
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    ten only based on our view of the world. This is usually not done with mal intent or consciously but purely because we s
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    the world in our own way based on our own experience through life.

    However, the danger in doing this is that it can pr
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    vent us being fair, just and seeing beyond our own experiences. We might therefore miss opportunities, be blind to diffe
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    ent perspectives and not take a balanced view.

    Have you ever assumed?

    * Big companies only work with big consul
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    ing firms

    * Price is the most important thing

    * It didn’t work before therefore it won’t work this time

    * I don’t hav
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    time for planning

    * Customers only want one thing – a deal!

    * Business is a numbers game so I need to meet laods of n
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
    w people

    There are more I’m sure and I urge you to recheck your assumptions of your clients, your business and your eve
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    yday dealings with people. Are you being fair and just based on the facts and evidence presented or are you making it up


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.e-folder.org.ua/article/44852/e-folder-Learning-From-the-Jury--Are-You-Letting-Assumptions-Damage-Your-Business.html">Learning From the Jury - Are You Letting Assumptions Damage Your Business?</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.e-folder.org.ua/article/44852/e-folder-Learning-From-the-Jury--Are-You-Letting-Assumptions-Damage-Your-Business.html]Learning From the Jury - Are You Letting Assumptions Damage Your Business?[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Make Your Move - Right Into Management

    Private Practice Marketing: 3 More Things I Wish I Knew When I First Started

    Public Relations for the Small Business

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com